My point is simple: Do you use antivirus software on your computer?One can easily find me simply by looking my name up in a local phone book. What's your point? Should I be ashamed of where I live? Only 30-35 minutes, 50 to 60 during rush hour if there is an accident, from downtown Rochester, btw. The roads here are pretty good considering. There are not long commutes, nor are there problems with traffic jams unless a major accident occurs (very rare).Paul----- Original Message -----From:Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 7:50 AMSubject: Re: [AmericanFreedoms] Pataki not king makerSo THAT'S where in NY you are!
Up by Rochester NY (about an hour drive west of it to be exact). Did I need a super-special supercomputer to find that out? Nope, you gave me all I needed, a zip code. Punch 14770 into Google and it will provide the map. I can probably look at the roof of your house if I bothered to spend the time to look for it. If you are curious just punch 34769 into Google. That is where I live. Yes, if you click on 'satellite' and know where to look you can actually see my home.
Don't ask, I won't tell you how to find it. Does it bother me that I can find my home on a (three year old) satellite pic? Yes, it IS kinda creepy this ability to locate someones home by knowing a street address, a city name and a US state. Or a zip code. Do the iranians know this? Of course they do. Am I afraid? Not really, the primary targets for them are either 30 miles NORTH or 30 miles WEST of me. And if their targeting systems ARE THAT BAD there won't be anything left of me to care.
But on a lighter note, punch the zip code 32830 into Google, click on 'satellite' and look at Disney World from space. HINT: ''spaceship earth'' a.k.a. ''the EPCOT golfball'' is the EASIEST landmark to find. Locate it, center it, zoom in on it, then follow the Monorail lines to other Disney World attractions...
P.S. TIP FOR TODAY: DON'T 'make public' your street address and/or phone number on the internet unless that is your BUSINESS address and phone number.
CAUTION IS IN ORDER. EVEN if you have a BUSINESS I recommend posting nothing more than a URL to your website (if you have one) a BUSINESS email addy or a BUSINESS phone number. All it took me was your zip code to answer my curiosity about where in NY you live.
BTW, This is where I was born: 14787. If you want to tell others ''Here I am!!!'' just use your zip code.
Paul wrote:Editor:Pataki claims he is not a king maker (Thur. Jan. 26, 2006, D&C "Cox Senate hopes fading fast"). I think the more likely fact is that the people who Pataki wants to run for office are not kings (Conservative and Constitutional leadership material), nor can they be in the more Conservative dominated (even still) Republican Party.That Pataki became king, uh, I mean governor, himself is due to his ability to schmooze, his capacity to lie about his own passions, etc. I refer specifically to the support of gun owners in his first two elections, after which he passed his 5 point law which outlawed Assault Weapons (really semi-automatic long guns, and pistols; firearms with certain cosmetic attributes), and created a database for pistol purchases by law abiding gun owners (the least likely to offend, i.e., rape, rob, murder), raised the age to get a pistol permit to 21, outlawed slingshots, and various knives, as well as making it illegal for persons under 18 to go outside carrying a BB gun without a parent or guardian present.Pataki abandoned his base, and he is now paying for that by prompting more Constitutionally conservative people to become involved in politics, especially the Republican Party. Further, most of the people Pataki has embellished with praise are, in essence, merely socialist infiltrators, like himself, of the Republican Party machine in New York State. They cannot make headway because their philosophy doesn't match the Conservative principles of the majority of the party. Nor ever did Pataki, but his name attached to any future contender may prove anathema to their election prospects.Paul
Winds of freedom. Unquenchable desire for freedom all over the world in every human heart. Democracy is on the March. In Egypt. In Lebanon. In the "Palestinian" lands getting ready to be part of the solution, as one of the states, in that two-state solution. Building Iraq the Model. Building Iraq the Light Unto the Muslim Nations. Can't cut and run. Must finish the job. Must finish the mission. Can't leave until Victory. Not until Total Victory. And it is coming, that Total Victory. You can be sure of it. Can't leave until the "Iraqi" government tells us it's time to leave. Can't leave until the generals tell us the "Iraqi" people are ready to assume their duties, and Iraq the Model is up and running. Can't leave. Can't. Just can't.Needless to say he (and I) are saying this with dripping sarcasam. As far as iraq is concerned;
Our leaving Iraq would mean UNCivil War there. That would be counterproductive to democracy. Should we still need to be there after Iran develops nukes, do you think a few million Iraqi civilians will stop them from dropping on on U.S. troops surrounding Baghdad?
A SURGE in support for the Islamic fundamentalist group Hamas in the run-up to Wednesday’s parliamentary elections is fuelling calls for Mahmoud Abbas, the 70-year-old Palestinian president, to step down after the vote.It appears HAMAS (a.k.a. CAIR) is poised to either win outright or have enough of an influence to drive the p.l.o. govenment. Condeleeza Rice seems to be ignorantly pushing for just such a result.
posted by YIH @ 4:43 AM on Thursday, January 19, 2006 :In a message dated 1/15/2006 8:28:27 P.M. Central Standard Time, newsveiws@yahoo.com writes:It is now time for the Iraqi people to take charge of their own affairs. Unless you think they need ''more handholding'' by us."It is time for the Iraqi people to take charge of their own affairs" Says who? You and Cindy Sheehan? What is so complex about understanding that they need to be able to be in a position to defend themselves from terrorists?
posted by YIH @ 5:59 PM on Sunday, January 15, 2006 :In a message dated 1/14/2006 11:58:25 P.M. Central Standard Time, newsveiws writes:That forces the question: If we can't ''teach the pig to sing'' why are we continuing to try?So I take it that you do not believe that freedom is an innate desire in most humans and that you want to fight terrorism on our shores instead of theirs?
This is what left media driven hysteria has done to our nation. The teen, like many teens, made a mistake, and paid for it with his life. The mistake was taking a gun to school, someplace where 30 years ago guns were shot, where training with firearms was accepted, even encouraged, where knowledge of safety, and responsibility, could be imparted. Today, we have a no tolerance of guns policy in almost all schools. The gun crazy media has advanced this hysteria driven policy. The school administrators have bought it hook, line, and sinkler, having most of them gone through the extensive reeducation camps of the U.S. which are today's college campuses.Paul RusinThe report here is that the student was surrounded by cops, that the parents weren't called until just before he was shot. His brother asked police to allow him in the room to talk to the student who had a bb pistol. He was reported to have pointed at at various classmates.
Christopher Penley, of Winter Springs, was accused of pulling a pellet gun in a classroom Friday and pointing it at other students. When he later raised the weapon at a deputy, a SWAT team member shot him, authorities said. Officers who had responded to the 1,100-student school in suburban Orlando believed the gun was a Beretta 9mm, and didn't learn until after the shooting that it was a pellet gunI don't blame the officer, he did exactly what he should have done. Under the same circumstances I would have done the same thing. If YOU point what appears to be a firearm at me I will YELL ''drop it!'' as I draw.
I think the intention of the poster was plain. Here is a pic of the ACTUAL 'pellet gun' in question:Baretta 9MMPellet gun
Penley was clinically brain dead Saturday, Nation said. "His organs are in the process of being harvested." Friends and investigators say Penley was bullied and emotionally distraught, and went to school that day expecting to die. Patrick Lafferty, a 15-year-old neighbor who has known Penley about six years, said he wasn't surprised by what happened. He said Penley was a loner who "told me he wanted to kill himself dozens of times."Hmm, we have ''a family spokeswoman'' AND a rattourney!!! Looks like junior got the suicide he wanted AND daddy thinks he got a winning lottery ticket!!!
Kelly Swofford, a family spokeswoman and neighbor of the boy's parents, said the boy had run away from home several times. Her 11-year-old son, Jeffery Swofford, said Penley had said he had something planned.
"He said `I hope I die today because I don't really like my life,"' Jeffery Swofford said.
posted by YIH @ 6:02 AM on :
Well it looks like Canada is becoming so politically correct that the whole nation will first accommodate Mohammedans, and then see the migration of neo-Mormon groups. This is the same question America will have to answer if it continues along its own homosexual agenda legalizing gay marriages. If Adam and Steve can get married the logic follows That Adam and Eve and Nellie and Suzie and Barbie and Bambi and so on will marry. Or even contrarily: Ada and Steve and Nelson and so on. Well you get the picture.
A culture is only as honest and virtuous and moral as its religious foundation. As liberal secular humanism takes over morality becomes relative. Unwittingly, secular humanism aids its unknown enemy - Mohammedanism - while shooting down its known enemy - Christianity. American will dissolve into obscurity as Athens if it does not protect its Christian Foundation as a nation.
Source: End polygamy ban, report urges Ottawa
posted by YIH @ 1:24 PM on Saturday, January 07, 2006 :
Been sick all week, so I will make this short.
I agree we needed to put the Saudis "house of Saud" in their place, and have stated this for quite awhile.
We have quietly moved, almost ALL of our military from Saudi Arabia.
And if you might of noticed, AFTER this happened.
Guess what?
Saudi's started having terrorism problems within.
But I DON'T think Iran is STUPID enough, to test a nuclear bomb.
This would be a death warrant, for them!
Israel, has said this openly.
As for abandoning Iraq, it wont happen with President Bush in office.
Maybe the next administration, will be a LIBERAL Administration, and cowardly do this.
Not this one! I don't agree with everything President Bush has done.
But he has done a better job.
Than ANYONE else, who "tried" to stepping up to the Presidential plate.
I would NOT, want his job.
Dammed if you do, and Dammed if you don't!
As for Japan. It seems to me that we STILL have OVER 40,000 American Troops stationed there.
And 70,000 troops STILL, stationed in Germany.
BTW, some folks conveniently seem to FORGET.
How many YEARS, it took to rebuild Germany after W.W.II.
"We LOST ''the war on terrorism'' on March 20th, 2003..."
Starting to sound like Pelosi, sKerry or Kennedy!!
They are Ultra Liberals!
Take care, be safe.
Good night.
Chris - AlaskaI understand what you are saying.
But here is the problem, saddam was CLEARLY NOT ''one of the worst''. The SAUDIS are the ones seeking to restablish the (sunni/wahabbi muslim) caliphate.
And they have OUR president sucking up to them.
The iranians are also seeking a shi'ite muslim caliphate, with the caliph there. I strongly suspect that before 2007 the iranians WILL successfully test a thermonuclear device.
THEN WHAT???
Do we abandon iraq and allow the iraqi civil war to begin?
BTW, THAT WILL happen. WHEN we reduce our forces to the point that ''the iraqis are on thier own'' the iraqi civil war will begin.
We SHOULD have scared the piss out of the muslims (it worked quite well against the Japanese, they are rather friendly now). We have the ability to do that. WE FAILED to do so when we had the opportunity.
But now we have a RETARDED ULTRA-LIBERAL in The White House who is setting up America for A STALINIST to take what bush has given her and turn it agianst HER ''enemies''.
We LOST ''the war on terrorism'' on March 20th, 2003.
if you want to give me hell, click on the 'comments' link and give me hell...Possibly we sent soldiers to Iraq to more than build a nation. Maybe you have not noticed, Islamofascists (of which Saddam Hussein was one of the worst) sole goal in life is to kill Jews and Americans and spread a Mohammedan revolution establishing a Caliphate to dominate the world.
It does a bit far fetched right now, however these people are crazy. They would just as soon take out innocent populations with nukes and hang the ecological consequences. Islamofascist have a death culture and America needs to take every opportunity to dissolve terrorists and those that harbor them wherever that might be.
Do you want to know why we are at war go here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/.
By RALPH PETERS l January 1, 2006
IRAQ made impressive progress in 2005. You wouldn't have known it from the daily news coverage or the surrender-now demands of left-wing extremists, but the long-suffering nation marched forward.
Here and abroad, the enemies of freedom insisted that failure was inevitable. Terrorists, insurgents, journalists with agendas, global America-haters and the Democratic Party's national leadership all tried to force our troops out of Iraq, no matter the consequences for the 26 million human beings who'd be left behind.
But the Iraqis refused to fail. Our troops refused to fail. And the Bush administration refused to fail.
Thank God.
Over the last 12 months, the pessimists called every major development wrong. But that won't stop them from doing everything they can again this year to devalue freedom, discredit democracy, drive Iraq toward civil war, encourage the terrorists and, above all, embarrass the Bush administration.
Our critics, foreign and domestic, will continue to ignore the human rights of millions while shrieking over the "mistreatment" of imprisoned terrorists and demanding a "fair" trial for Saddam (in Europe, with no death penalty). But the left's self-righteous bluster sounds more like sour-grape nagging every day.
CONSIDER just a dozen of the many reasons for optimism about Iraq:
1) Despite left-wing arguments that the peoples of the Middle East aren't ready to rule themselves through the ballot box, Iraq just held its third nationwide vote ? with higher levels of participation than an American presidential election.
2) Iraq's Sunni Arabs, who were supposed to doom democracy, came out in masses to vote this time. They were disappointed that their minority numbers didn't magically give them a majority (sound familiar?), but their largest parties are maneuvering for places in the new government.
3) The terrorists lost a lot of ground last year, figuratively and literally. Their savagery backfired with the population, and more Iraqi security forces stood up for their country. Meanwhile, our troops killed terrorists in satisfying and lopsided numbers. The result? The terrorists still can create nasty local problems ? but they can't destroy Iraq's future.
4) The Sunni Arab insurgents lost steam. Attacks still make headlines, but Iraq's major cities are far more secure than they were a year ago. Major combat operations moved from big cities to smaller cities ? and then down to dusty border towns.
5) Every terrorist and insurgent tactic failed. Bombs may kill individuals, but they haven't been able to kill the new Iraq ? or dishearten our troops. Extremist atrocities alienated Iraqis, and attacks on the country's infrastructure haven't won the bad guys any new friends. At present, they've shifted their efforts to concentrate on Iraq's oil industry. They'll fail this time, too.
6) Our military leaders are so confident about the situation that they believe we can reduce our troop levels significantly in 2006. So much for being defeated.
7) The international community became much more supportive of the new Iraq, forgiving Saddam-era debts while increasing aid and loans to the government. Foreign investment soared in peaceful Kurdistan (even the Turks invested).
8) The Middle East is changing, thanks to our removal of Saddam and our military presence. The process may seem glacially slow to our impatient tempers, but until our tanks reached Baghdad there was no hope of change at all. Now, Syrian troops are out of Lebanon, the Damascus regime is shaking, the whacky-for-Allah president of Iran is panicstricken, and even the Saudis have decided that supporting evil in Iraq is bound to come back at them. Egypt's Hosni Mubarak is next.
9) Far from being discouraged, our Army and Marine veterans of Iraq have been re-enlisting in startlingly high numbers ? knowing they'll be sent back to Iraq. The let's-just-surrender trio of Dean, Reid and Pelosi may believe we're bound to fail, but our troops are voluntarily betting their lives on a win.
10) President Bush found his voice again. After allowing the give-it-all-to-the-terrorists crowd to shape our domestic debate for far too long, Bush came out swinging ? and raised his popularity ratings significantly. Deeds weren't enough. The president had to sound like a wartime leader. These days, he does.
11) The American people displayed their inborn common sense again. As antiwar activists betrayed our troops with lies that we were losing, their fellow citizens shifted back behind the administration late last year. Abandoned by nervous Democrats, Cindy Sheehan had to go to Spain to attract an audience (even in Madrid, she didn't get much of one).
12) After failing to convince America's citizens or our troops that Iraq was doomed, our get-Bush-at-all-costs media shifted to exaggerating the domestic threat from intelligence surveillance. To hear the pundits howl, you'd think the National Security Agency had microphones in our showers and the CIA kept agents under our beds. But the dictatorship-of-the-intellectuals bunch failed again ? instead of being outraged, a large majority of Americans support using any intelligence means necessary to get the terrorists before they get us. Made-in-Missouri common sense wins again.
WE should be encouraged by the progress in Iraq and heartened by the American people's distrust of elitist propaganda. From Hollywood's latest anti-American rant to the decaying New York Times, the stars of the America's Most Arrogant Show have had to learn yet again that we don't take orders from trust-fund snots, campus cowards or actors (when Alfred Hitchcock said, "Actors are cattle," he was being far too kind).
We, the people, support our troops. And we don't like it when cynical activists and political hacks try to exploit those in uniform. Americans will always trust G.I. Joe (and Jane) over the latte lizards at moveon.org.
As we enter this new year, much could still go wrong in Iraq. The remarkable Arab genius for failure still might thwart the progress made to date. Minority and women's rights are threatened. The old grudges haven't vanished. Corruption, the developing world's favorite contact sport, could undo Iraq's new government. Many Iraqis may have to learn for themselves that theology and government don't mix.
Even as they falter, insurgents and terrorists will continue to generate headlines ? their last, best hope. More of our troops will bleed in the cause of universal freedom. And as our own midterm elections approach, we'll hear no end of defeatist rhetoric from the Democratic Party and its partisans in the media.
But most Iraqis chose to vote, rather than shoot. Iraqis bear more and more of their own security burden. The world has begun to realize how high the stakes are in Baghdad. And global terror lost ground in 2005.
Every American reading these words should be proud of our troops, our country and our cause.
By James Lileks
No one is reading newspapers. Not even the people who make the newspaper. Even its traditional markets — cat-box liner, packing for glassware when you move — have been taken over by new alternatives. (You can pack your glassware in cat-box litter, for example.) Newspapers are dead.
Really? People have been predicting the death of papers since TV started slaughtering the afternoon dailies. The rise of the home computer, for example, convinced investors to sink bazillions in proprietary systems that delivered the news on eye-killing, tumor-inducing low-res monitors. Newspapers survived. AOL did not kill the paper, because the daily paper never had AOL's technological problems. (I can't open the paper! It's busy!) Cable talk shows did not kill the paper, unless you believe people have decided that Bill O'Reilly somehow replaces the comics and horoscopes.
Bias didn't kill the papers; even if you believe that the modern paper is staffed entirely with Bolsheviks intent on forcing everyone into hemp jumpsuits and hybrid autos, the market for lefty-slanted news is still substantial. If you can't make a pretty penny peddling Bush-Is-Evil in this market, you're not trying.
What threatens newspapers is the medium itself. Its virtues are undeniable — it has dispatches from foreign lands, lost-pet ads, AND it mops up spills. It has ease of use, serendipity, tradition, a reputation assembled over the decades, a mix of high and low. That's the problem: It's all things to all people.
This is the era of narrowcasting, of picking and choosing from a hundred different sources, most of which cover the topic better than most newspapers. No one interested in computers bothers with what newspapers have to say about the subject; no one eager to discuss the last episode of "Lost" flips to the TV page on Thursday morn. It's all on the Web — the greatest public square in human history, complete with pickpockets and sphincterless pigeons.
Technology is rewriting the paradigms with such speed that newspapers can barely report on them in a timely fashion, let alone adapt.
A layout artist using a fancy program to arrange wire copy on a page is still doing a Gutenberg, so to speak. Meanwhile, the technologically savvy are plucking their own information out of the ether and sorting it to fit their twitchy modern lives. NBC provides podcasts of its popular news programs, and you can automate the download. Grab the iPod on the way out the door, connect the FM transmitter in the car, and voila: customized radio en route to work. How can newspapers compete without giving every subscriber a personal servant who reads the paper aloud from the back seat?
But it's not a fatal spiral. Not if newspapers go local. Unfortunately, most papers still see themselves as the Trusted Guardians of the Global Yesterday, serving up a cold meal of worldwide news to people who've already read the updates on the Web. This is a mistake. Leave the big picture to The New York Times and the Washington Post and the networks. Get small. Only newspapers have the resources to cover their hometowns. Yes, newspaper readers want to know about the world. But they also want crime and restaurant reviews and cute spelling bee winners and dog photos and anti-pothole crusades.
Also, stop chasing the younger market. They do not care what your reviewer thinks of "Doom the Movie." They played the game AND blew through the expansion pack AND downloaded a bootleg of the film on BitTorrent. Trying to court this demographic makes newspapers look like Grandpa doing the Funky Chicken, and it hurts.
In any case, newspapers are dead, the experts assure us. Pity, but these things happen. Media rise and fall. People move on. Why, once upon a time, millions of Americans got their news and opinions by listening to the AM band of the radio. AM radio! Really.
Who could imagine such a thing today?
Chris wrote:
posted by YIH @ 4:17 AM on :
Michael Ramirez is (in my opinion), one of the best Conservative Pulitzer Prize winning cartoonists.
He was let go (can you say FIRED) by the left cost L.A.Times on 12-31-05.
Now I have no reason, to ever read their web site again!
Take care, be safe.
Good night.
Chris - Alaska
Clink on the link to see some of his last cartoons, before they are removed.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-include-ramirez,0,364695.ssipage?coll
Possibly we sent soldiers to Iraq to more than build a nation. Maybe you have not noticed, Islamofascists (of which Saddam Hussein was one of the worst) sole goal in life is to kill Jews and Americans and spread a Mohammedan revolution establishing a Caliphate to dominate the world.
It does a bit far fetched right now, however these people are crazy. They would just as soon take out innocent populations with nukes and hang the ecological consequences. Islamofascist have a death culture and America needs to take every opportunity to dissolve terrorists and those that harbor them wherever that might be.
Do you want to know why we are at war go here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/.
posted by YIH @ 3:15 AM on :As I opened my year-end e-mail, I was greeted with a letter that caught my attention - and my breath. So rare, it was. So simple, and so stunningly disarming.
It was an apology from a reader, who wrote:
"In going through my 'out' file the other day I came across an e-mail I sent you concerning something or other that I was obviously exercised over. I said to you, 'I used to think you were worth reading, etc., etc.' That was uncalled for and rude. I apologize."
I quickly wrote back: "What a nice way to begin the new near. Apology accepted. Thank you."
Few are the apologies I receive or extend, and the launch of a new year seems a good time to correct that oversight. But first a few observations about the nature of offense and the value of making amends.I'm not sure how we became so rough or why, Because there are times when people deserve it as a nation, we decided that manners don't matter. That was caused by years of politeness being used in a dismissive and condecending way.
I'm not lecturing here. As with most of my columns, I'm really talking to myself. The fact that others read and react to my thoughts will always be a source of wonder to me.
When you sit alone in a room with a keyboard and think aloud, as it were, it is never with the idea of an audience. As a blogger, I'm calling BS here, if I didn't think anyone would bother to read this I wouldn't bother doing it. Unlike you I'm not getting paid (yet, but hope to change that in the future). At least not for me. The thought of actual readers probably would render me wordless, a result many doubtless would applaud. Wait, I have their e-mail addresses right here! Veiled threat?
Despite my newspaper affiliation, I've worked essentially alone the past 20 years, mostly from home (a pajamahadeen in the pre-blog era), See? She was blogging before blogging was cool. Myself, I call it 'spin' tweaking the culture based on decades of reporting, experience and observation. For reasons that continue to baffle as well as humble, I've been granted a forum over time by readers who still take newspapers with their morning coffee. Bless their hearts. Please keep buying and reading papers, pretty please.
Of all my mistakes through my years, the ones I regret most were errors of judgment and civility more than matters of fact, which are more easily corrected. As H.L. Mencken put it (and as Paul Greenberg recently reminded us in his lovely New Year's column): "Anyone can be accurate and even profound, but it is damned hard work to make criticism charming."
The temptation of clever cruelty is seductive. Quite true Oh, that turn of phrase that makes you slap your own thigh in delight. La Perp, at times, c'est moi.
But the arena calls for it, no? Actually, yes. If you smack down blogs and bloggers, you are going to catch hell for it from them. Have you failed to notice that? The masses want sangre! Or do they?
In searching for an answer, it is helpful to be on the receiving end of invective. Nothing like a taste of one's own blood to resurrect interest in the Golden Rule. It is equally bracing to be treated with respect, if only to recognize how rare it is and how little most of us contribute to the cause of civility. Charming criticism is, indeed, art.
If one were to plot the decline of civility in discourse, I suspect the parallel line would represent technology, especially the Internet, e-mail and the blogosphere - all too fast, too easy and too anonymous. Methinks we have a slow learner here. E-mail, most of all, is fraught with the potential for imminent regret. "Do not drink and send" should be the sticky note attached to many home computers. If you think what she wrote was stupid and way off base you are merely intoxicated, thank you for your insight, Ms. Parker (BTW, I assure you I am quite sober as I write this) As a rule, I delete hate mail as soon as I recognize it in order to thwart my own reflexive tendency to lash back. Sometimes nature wins:
"Oh yeah? Well, you and your cocker spaniel, too!" It's cool to have a dead-tree column in order to strike back at the nastygrams.
When I'm occasionally smarter, and return fire with butter instead of the always-tempting bunker buster, voila, the most amazing thing happens. Humanity returns to the ecosystem. Invariably, the person who wrote to assert my canine ancestry or to impugn my husband's masculinity is suddenly Aunt Bee extending a warm apple pie. No longer hostile, she offers gratitude for the response and apologizes for the nasty missive.
Not because she doesn't still disagree with whatever I wrote that initially set her off Perhaps another dead-tree writer (and also blogger) called her on that bonehead smear job on bloggers?- or because I'm so dadgum adorable I'm judging you purely on the text of these columns, not by your photo - but because we're no longer anonymous. We're just people - fellow and fallible human beings tangled in the same sticky web we call Life - while Technos is revealed as the cold-blooded provocateur he is. Hmm, your male critics who blog are cyborgs? How nice.
In which spirit, and in gratitude to the e-mailer who went first, I'd like to begin the new year with an apology to those whom I've offended or hurt with careless words or poor judgment. I'm s-, sss-, soh .(I must be a guy, this is so hard) ((That's a joke.)) Sorry. I'm sorry. No, really. I am. Due to all the obfucation above, who and what you are sorry about is rather unclear.
Onward, then, here's to health, prosperity - and greater civility - in the new year. And all you bloggers out there? I love you, man.
Peace.
The final three senteces here made me just wince. Faking 'hipness' IS SO TRANSPARENT.
Here is how it should have read:
In last week's column what I wrote appeared to be a wholesale attack on blogs and blogging. Several bloggers have taken me to task for this approach, as well they should have. I was also mistaken for telling people ''we can and should ignore them'' as well as suggesting those who are not professionals are worthy of being ignored.
(the column that started this can be found here).
The rebuttal column came off as a non-apology apology. It also tries to combine blogs with her typical hate mail. Then to top it off plays the ''don't get mad at cute l'll 'ol me'' card for all it's worth. It appears to be the previous column topped off with a dollop of cutesy then goes on to continue the bashing.
APOLOGY NOT ACCEPTED.
Get it right next time...
posted by YIH @ 1:03 PM on Thursday, January 05, 2006 :